I picked up Wasmund’s at Astor Place last week because it is a non-bourbon American whiskey that I’ve never heard of before. That intrigues me. I’m always looking for people who are innovating and trying new things in the spirits industry here in the US, even if that means attempting to recreate another nation’s approach, as the “single malt” moniker implies.
Another intriguing element of Wasmund’s is its age of…wait for it…four months. Four months! There I was, looking at a bottle filled with brown whiskey that’s four months old? At the very least, this would be an experience similar to Georgia Moon or perhaps last week’s brandy, both young spirits. At best, the creator had worked some distillation magic and produced a fine, but extremely young drink. Either way, it would be interesting.
– Made by Copper Fox Distillery
– 96 proof
Wasmund’s label is nothing special. It displays its name in bold red letters at its curved top, below which are depicted an axe & chopping block (having recently chopped some wood chips), a copper pot still, and a trio of casks. In no fewer than four more fonts, the label describes where it’s from, that it’s non chill-filtered, that it’s a single malt whisky (no ‘e’), and that it’s falvored and colored with applewood, cherrywood, and oak. In the background there’s a stylized fox.
There are too many fonts to allow me to enjoy this label. The color scheme (red, black, tan) is attractive enough, and – individually – the graphic elements are passable, but over all it comes across as cluttered and unfocused. They would be better off focusing on the fox logo as a central element and cutting down the font-madness.
I have seen worse, however.
On the back label, creator Rick Wasmund makes the case for his whisky. He describes following a traditional Scottish method, except replacing peat with fruit woods: interesting. He also says that the spirit is aged in casks along with wood chips: that explains the mere four months of aging!
Aging with wood chips is a common practice amon home-distillers who lack access to proper casks to mature their product, but I can’t recall any other commercial brand that uses this practice. In theory it makes a lot of sense: whiskeys reach maturity as a result of its contact with the wood, therefore if you increase the exposed surface area of wood, you wll reach maturity faster. Having been founded only in 2000, Copper Fox is a young operation, and most likely saw this method as a way to bring the product to the market in a shorter time frame – namely, four months.
Clever. Whether or not this turns out well, I applaud Mr. Wasmund for his willingness to experiment and question orthodoxies in the American whiskey industry. We need more people trying more methods in order to stay relevant and to push our industry further.
To the nose, Wasmund’s is largely made up of smoke, rubber, wood, and alcohol. The wood scent is not the familiar oak; this must be the apple and cherry woods described. Yet, the youth of this whiskey comes through in the harsh alcohol scent that accompanies it.
On tasting, the prominent sensation is something like salt cod, beyond which lies that non-oak wood, a bit of smoke, and a general impression of the ocean. The finish is long, hot, and peppery.
This is surpisingly mature for a four (!) month old whiskey, but still clearly young. The flavors come and go with a speed and clarity that belies their variety and its heat, if nothing else, betrays its youth.
It is also definitely in the Scotch style. That oceanic sensation is a reflection of this, perhaps owing to the smoking of the barley before fermentation.
This is not my favorite whiskey. It is, however, a good effort at breaking the accepted practices of whiskey making in America. We should judge practices like aging with wood chips by the spirits they produce, rather than by the processes we are familiar with. In that light, though they are far from where they could be, I encourage Mr. Wasmun in his efforts, and hope to see other varieties from Copper Fox soon.